|
|
Post by Hard-boiled Harry on Jul 29, 2013 7:42:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by littlerascal4891 on Aug 5, 2013 22:55:00 GMT -5
Yeah, 2,000 dollars? I don't think so, haha.
That's a really cute picture of Darla, though. :-)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2015 17:22:19 GMT -5
I think it's the cutest picture of Darla I have ever seen. Looks more like an older Darla, to be honest.
No way will I be spending $2,000 on such photo.
And why would you want to pay $2,000 for the photo when you could download it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Buppster on Feb 25, 2018 9:50:15 GMT -5
I think it's the cutest picture of Darla I have ever seen. Looks more like an older Darla, to be honest. No way will I be spending $2,000 on such photo. And why would you want to pay $2,000 for the photo when you could download it? Perhaps because it's a real vintage photo which Darla Hood presumably handled and signed with her own fair hand? I couldn't afford to pay that sort of price for a signed photo but I did pay $500 for one signed by Harry Spear. Equating a genuine vintage photo with a digital downloaded copy of it is like equating a diamond with a piece of coal, on the grounds that they're both just Carbon. |
|
